TABLE 5.
Sample ID | Seq num | OTU Num1 | Shannon Index2 | ACE index3 | Chao1 index3 | Coverage4 | Simpson index2 |
BD1 | 42258 | 526 | 0.93 | 1719.43 | 1018.77 | 0.99 | 0.66 |
BD7 | 47169 | 3395 | 7.14 | 3402.66 | 3396.20 | 1.00 | 0.01 |
SD1 | 69351 | 283 | 0.98 | 496.37 | 426.57 | 1.00 | 0.66 |
SD7 | 58766 | 640 | 0.93 | 1034.53 | 935.02 | 0.99 | 0.70 |
CD1 | 49884 | 646 | 2.94 | 819.58 | 736.27 | 1.00 | 0.11 |
CD7 | 56046 | 629 | 0.94 | 997.27 | 906.07 | 0.99 | 0.73 |
1OTUs were defined at the 97% sequence similarity level. 2Shannon and Simpson index were community diversity parameters. A higher number of Shannon index indicates a higher diversity, whereas a higher number of Simpson indicates a lower diversity. 3ACE index and Chao1 index were community richness parameters. A higher number indicates more richness. 4Coverage was the sequencing depth index, reflecting if the sequencing result represents the real situation of a sample. A higher number indicates lower probability that the sequence is not detected in the sample. Coverage of 1.00 means all the possible species in a sample has been covered in the sequencing.