Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 30;11:607. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00607

Table 2.

Treatment of SCI patients with chronic injuries by electrical stimulation: change in ISNCSCI Motor Score.

Paper n Motor complete/ incomplete SCS/FES Implant/ surface Tonic/ phasic Walking/ cycling Therapy Duration (months) Therapy intensity (sessions/week) Total number of training sessions Mean (range): improvement in ISNCSCI Motor Score
Possover (35)a 4 Complete/incomplete (B/C) FES Implant Phasic Walking 12 3–5 156–260 12.8 (1–21)
McDonald et al. (59)b 1 Complete (A) FES Surface Phasic Cycling 36 7 1,092 20
Wagner et al. (63) 3 Incomplete (C/D) SCS Implant Phasic Walking + cycling 5 5 108 10.3 (4–16)
Sadowsky et al. (60) 25 Complete/incomplete (A/B/C) FES Surface Phasic Cycling 29.5 (Range 3–168) 3 360 (Range 36–2016) 8.1 (NR)
Gerasimenko et al. (64) 5 Complete (B) SCS + drug Surface Tonic Walking (zero-gravity) 4 1 16 7 (NR)
Yaşar et al. (62) 10 Incomplete (C/D) FES Surface Phasic Cycling 3 3 36 4.7 (NR)*
Duffell et al. (61) 6 Incomplete (C/D) FES Surface Phasic Cycling 1 3 12 4.7 (0–13)*
Angeli et al. (89) 4 Complete (A/B) SCS Implant Tonic Walking Range 6–20 7 168–560 0.25 (0–1)
Carhart et al. (88) 1 Incomplete (C) SCS Implant Tonic Walking 7 5 140 0
Grahn et al. (85) 1 Complete (A) SCS Implant Tonic Walking 0.5 4 8 0
a

Possover applied continuous low-frequency pelvic nerve stimulation between the training phases.

b

McDonald supplemented FES cycling with continuous stimulation of trunk muscles.

*

Improvement in ISNCSCI motor score taken from follow-up data, as opposed to end of training data.

NR, Not Reported.