Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 12;17(12):4202. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124202

Table 3.

Differences in household characteristics between fruit and vegetable prescription program participants and non-participants.

Household Characteristics Total Sample Participants Non-Participants p-Value for Difference by Program Participation
Total Responses 142 86 56 <0.001
WIC a Participant—n (%) 65 (45.8) 50 (58.1) 15 (26.8)
Total Responses 140 85 55 0.990
SNAP b Participant—n (%) 89 (63.6) 54 (63.5) 35 (63.6)
Total Responses 141 86 55 0.188
Double-Up Food Bucks c Participant—n (%) 34 (24.1) 24 (27.9) 10 (18.2)
Total Responses 141 85 56 0.005
Farmers’ Market Shopping in Past Month—n (%) 58 (41.1) 43 (50.6) 15 (26.8)
Total Responses 141 85 56 0.007
Farmers’ Market Shopping in Past Year—n (%) 94 (66.7) 64 (75.3) 30 (53.6)
Total Responses 140 85 55 0.794
Low/Very Low Food Security—n (%) 63 (45.0) 39 (45.9) 24 (43.6)
Total Responses 140 85 55 0.667
Food Security d—mean ± SD 1.84 ± 1.98 1.89 ± 2.06 1.75 ± 1.89
Total Responses 102 66 36 0.980
NFE e—mean ± SD 257 ± 238 257 ± 240 258 ± 239

a WIC = Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children; b SNAP = Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; c Duble-Up Food Bucks = Statewide fruit and vegetable incentive program that doubles the value of SNAP benefits spent at participating markets and grocery stores to purchase fresh fruits and vegetables; d US Household Food Security Module: Six Item Short Form, National Center for Health Statistics. Food security status assigned by raw score (0–1 = high/marginal food security; 2–4 = low food security; 5–6 = very low food security); e NFE = Neighborhood Food Environment score.