Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 21;17(12):4462. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124462

Table 4.

Comparison between end-of-program and follow-up number of participants in low, moderate and high scoring groups for the three food literacy behaviour domains (a) plan and manage, (b) selection, and (c) preparation.

Plan and Manage (n = 552, p = 0.0015) *
Follow-Up
Low Moderate High
End of Program Low
Moderate
High
26 (40.0%)
15 (8.6%)
8 (2.6%)
25 (38.5%)
73 (41.7%)
48 (15.4%)
14 (21.5%)
87 (49.7%)
256 (82.1%)
Selection (n = 589, p < 0.0001) *
Follow-Up
Low Moderate High
End of Program Low
Moderate
High
20 (26.7%)
17 (9.7%)
11 (3.2%)
25 (33.3%) 30 (40.0%)
97 (55.4%)
279 (82.3%)
61 (34.9%)
49 (14.5%)
Preparation (n = 576, p = 0.0985)
Follow-Up
Low Moderate High
End of Program Low 47 (56.0%) 23 (27.4%) 14 (16.7%)
Moderate 36 (18.7%) 94 (48.7%) 63 (32.5%)
High 21 (7.0%) 80 (26.8%) 198 (66.2%)

* Percentages refer to the specific beginning-of-program population (low, moderate, or high).