Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 21;13(12):2798. doi: 10.3390/ma13122798

Table 5.

Comparison among the matching percentage between the mandibular models obtained with different semi-automatic segmentation software and the ground truth mandibular model (manual segmentation), according to the deviation analysis. p-value based on one-way ANOVA.

Tolerance Software Sample Mean SD Confidential Interval F Significance
Lower Limit Upper Limit
Tolerance A ITK-Snap a 20 88.44 b,c,d 1.70 87.65 89.23 405.80 p < 0.005
Invesalius b 20 81.79 a,c 3.10 80.35 83.25
Dolphin 3D c 20 60.01 a,b,d 3.10 58.57 61.47
Slicer 3D d 20 82.21 a,c 2.90 80.86 83.57
Total 80 78.12 11.18 75.63 80.60 - -
Tolerance B ITK-Snap a 20 97.30 b,c,d 1.42 96.63 97.97 60.64 p < 0.005
Invesalius b 20 90.19 a,c 3.27 88.66 91.73
Dolphin 3D c 20 87.76 a,b,d 2.50 86.60 88.93
Slicer 3D d 20 90.57 a,c 1.76 89.75 91.40
Total 80 91.46 4.24 90.51 92.40 - -

a-b-c-d = symbols according to the Scheffè test for post-hoc multiple comparison. SD = Standard deviation. A = range of tolerance set at 0.2 mm; B = range of tolerance set at 0.5 mm.