Table 3.
Association of women’s characteristics with the types of health facility where they accessed FP services (private vs. public), EDHS 2016 (n = 3696).
| Women Characteristics | OR1 (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| COR 1 (95% CI) | AOR 1 (95% CI) | |
| Age in Years | ||
| 15–24 | 1 | 1 |
| 25–34 | 0.69 (0.51, 0.96) ** | 1.02 (0.65, 1.64) |
| 35+ | 0.44 (0.29,0.56) *** | 1.07 (0.56, 2.06) |
| Place of Residence | ||
| Urban | 4.44 (3.05, 6.46) *** | 3.91 (1.71, 4.95) *** |
| Rural | 1 | 1 |
| Religion | ||
| Orthodox | 1 | 1 |
| Muslim | 1.02 (0.67, 1.53) | 1.63 (1.07, 2.48) * |
| Protestant | 0.62 (0.41, 0.96) * | 0.93 (0.56, 1.53) |
| Other/missing | 0.70 (0.16, 3.02) | 1.24 (0.25, 6.28) |
| Highest Educational Status | ||
| None | 1 | 1 |
| Primary | 1.99 (1.41, 2.83) *** | 1.8 (0.71, 1.65) |
| Secondary+ | 4.34 (2.97, 6.33) *** | 0.91 (0.52, 1.60) |
| Partner’s Educational Status (n = 3416) $ | ||
| None | 1 | 1 |
| Primary | 1.85 (1.26, 2.72) ** | 1.49 (0.99, 2.23) |
| Secondary+ | 3.79 (2.44, 5.87) *** | 1.64 (1.01, 2.70) * |
| Working/Occupational Status | ||
| Not working | 1 | 1 |
| Working $ | 1.60 (1.18, 2.17) ** | 1.35 (1.01, 1.96) * |
| Wealth Index | ||
| Poor | 1 | 1 |
| Middle | 1.51 (0.97, 2.37) *** | 1.54 (0.96, 2.47) |
| Rich | 3.31 (2.21, 4.96) *** | 1.51 (0.90, 2.54) |
| Number of Living Children | ||
| 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 1–2 | 0.35 (0.22, 0.55) *** | 0.27 (0.15, 0.47) ** |
| 3–4 | 0.27 (0.17, 0.42) *** | 0.23 (0.11, 0.46) ** |
| 5+ | 0.14 (0.08, 0.26) *** | 0.18 (0.08, 0.41) ** |
| Exposure to FP Media | ||
| No | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 2.33 (1.70, 3.19) *** | 0.97 (0.66, 1.44) |
FP—Family Planning OR—Odds Ratio COR—Crude Odds Ratio AOR—Adjusted Odds Ratio, 1 Public facility was taken as a reference in the regression analysis. $ Working includes those women who describe themselves as employed or engaged in a work that paid them in cash or in kind *** p-value < 0.001 ** p-value < 0.01 * p-value < 0.05.