Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 9.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 18;207:116370. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116370

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

(a) Similarity of FC or node weights within (main diagonal) and between-conditions (off-diagonal). The similarity was quantified by the correlations of whole-brain FC or node weights between each condition pairs. The weight distributions demonstrated higher within-condition similarities (r [FC weights] = 0.654–0.757, r[node weights] = 0.622–0.734) than between-condition similarities (r [FC weights] = 0.185–0.289, r[node weights] = 0.224–0.338). (b) Edge overlap within (main diagonal) and between (off-diagonal) each pair of fMRI conditions. Cells in the matrix plots are plotted as number of shared edges within and between each pair of cognitive conditions. Values in the row or column names represent the number of edges identified by permutation test under a threshold of p < 0.05. The PVT and ORRT models are represented in the lower and upper triangles respectively.