Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 10;10(6):390. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10060390

Table 2.

Statistical comparison of self-expandable metallic stents: Fully-covered (FCSEMS) vs Uncovered (UCSEMS).

Meta-Analysis by Saleem et al. Comparing FCSEMS and USEMS for Distal MBS [17]
Weighted Mean Difference (Days) of FCSEMS vs. UCSEMS Relative Risk (RR) of FCSEMS vs. UCSEMS
Patient survival +51.2 Migration 8.11
Stent patency +60.6 Overgrowth 2.03
Stent survival +68.9 Sludge 2.89
Ingrowth 0.23