Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 22;17(12):4478. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124478

Table 1.

Prevalence and bivariate analysis of the association of pain, severe pain, and number of pain sites with the variables of socio-demographic, status, food intake, and lifestyle in severely obese adults (n = 150).

Variable Pain Severe Pain Four or More Painful Sites
Prevalence n (%) PR (95% CI) p Prevalence n (%) PR (95% CI) p Prevalence n (%) PR (95% CI) p
Gender 0.158 0.901 0.036
Male 17 (77.27) 1 15 (68.18) 1 6 (27.27) 1
Female 117 (91.41) 1.18 (0.94–1.49) 89 (69.53) 1.02 (0.75–1.39) 74 (57.81) 2.12 (1.05–4.27)
Age (years) 0.406 * 0.687 0.864
18–39 69 (90.79) 1 51 (67.11) 1 39 (51.32) 1
40–49 48 (90.57) 0.99 (0.89–1.12) 37 (69.81) 1.04 (0.82–1.32) 29 (54.72) 1.07 (0.77–1.48)
50 or more 17 (80.95) 0.89 (0.72–1.11) 16 (76.19) 1.14 (0.85–1.51) 12 (57.14) 1.11 (0.72–1.71)
Occupation 0.968 0.936 0.678
Formal worker 45 (90.00) 1.01 (0.89–1.16) 34 (68.00) 0.96 (0.74–1.24) 26 (52.00) 1.04 (0.71–1.52)
Informal worker/self-employed 46 (88.46) 1 37 (71.15) 1 26 (50.00) 1
Retired/housewife and others 1 43 (89.58) 1.01 (0.88–1.16) 33 (68.75) 0.97 (0.75–1.25) 28 (58.33) 1.17 (0.81–1.68)
Lives with partner 0.552 0.748 0.204
No 48 (87.27) 0.96 (0.85–1.09) 39 (70.91) 1.04 (0.83–1.29) 33 (60.00) 1.21 (0.90–1.63)
Yes 86 (90.53) 1 65 (68.42) 1 47 (49.47) 1
Schooling (years) 0.598 0.081 0.744
≤10 66 (88.00) 0.97 (0.87–1.08) 57 (76.00) 1.21 (0.97–1.51) 41 (54.67) 1.05 (0.78–1.42)
≥11 68 (90.67) 1 47 (62.67) 1 39 (52.00) 1
Economic class 0.303 * 0.079 * 0.004
A-B 28 (82.35) 1 19 (55.88) 1 10 (29.41) 1
C 83 (90.22) 1.09 (0.92–1.30) 65 (70.65) 1.26 (0.91–1.75) 52 (56.52) 1.92 (1.11–3.34)
D 23 (95.83) 1.16 (0.97–1.39) 20 (83.33) 1.49 (1.05–2.11) 18 (75.00) 2.55 (1.44–4.52)
Smoker 0.267 * 0.232 0.508
No 88 (87.13) 1 67 (66.34) 1 52 (51.49) 1
Yes 46 (93.88) 1.08 (0.97–1.20) 37 (75.51) 1.14 (0.92–1.41) 28 (57.14) 1.11 (0.82–1.51)
Alcohol consumption 0.450 0.497 0.981
No 97 (90.65) 1.05 (0.92–1.21) 76 (71.03) 1.09 (0.85–1.40) 57 (53.27) 0.99 (0.71–1.39)
Yes 37 (86.05) 1 28 (65.12) 1 23 (53.49) 1
Fruit consumption (daily) 0.173 0.774 0.528
No 101 (91.82) 1.11 (0.95–1.30) 77 (70.00) 1.04 (0.81–1.33) 57 (51.82) 0.90 (0.65–1.24)
Yes 33 (82.50) 1 27 (67.50) 1 23 (57.50) 1
Vegetable consumption (daily) 1.000 * 0.867 0.420
No 97 (88.99) 1 76 (69.72) 1 56 (51.38) 1
Yes 37 (90.24) 1.01 (0.90–1.14) 28 (68.29) 0.98 (0.77–1.25) 24 (58.54) 1.14 (0.83–1.56)
Sedentary time (min/day) 0.399 0.432 0.680
<Median (1182.15) 63 (88.73) 0.95 (0.86–1.06) 52 (73.24) 1.09 (0.88–1.35) 40 (56.34) 1.06 (0.79–1.44)
≥Median (1182.15) 65 (92.86) 1 47 (67.14) 1 37 (52.86) 1
LPA (min/day) 0.752 0.498 0.551
<Median (164.89) 65 (91.55) 1 48 (67.61) 1 37 (52.11) 1
≥Median (164.89) 63 (90.00) 0.98 (0.88–1.09) 51 (72.86) 1.08 (0.87–1.34) 40 (57.14) 1.10 (0.81–1.48)
MVPA (min/day) 0.009 * 0.432 0.680
<Median (8.48) 69 (97.18) 1.15 (1.03–1.29) 52 (73.24) 1.09 (0.88–1.35) 40 (56.34) 1.06 (0.79–1.44)
≥Median (8.48) 59 (84.29) 1 47 (67.14) 1 37 (52.86) 1

1 Other includes: student, rural worker, unemployed, laid off, receiving pension, and sick-pay recipient. CI: confidence interval; LPA: light physical activity; MVPA: moderate to vigorous physical activity; PR: adjusted prevalence ratio. Wald test was used to calculate all “p” values, except when frequencies were below five, in which case, Fisher’s exact test * was used. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (bold mark). Variables with p < 0.20 were further analyzed by multiple hierarchical Poisson regression.