Table 3.
Indicators and Description | Physical Descriptive Power | Perceptive Descriptive Power | |
---|---|---|---|
Energetic indicators | LeqT continuous equivalent sound pressure level during time period T Ln continuous equivalent sound pressure level during night period Lden, day, evening, night combined indicator [20,21,22] |
Cumulative energetic indicators. A, C or Z frequency weighting | Correlated to long term health effects |
Statistical indicators | L90 [23], 90% percentile level | Describes background noise | Does not emerge from studies |
L50, 50% percentile level [24] | Good for discriminating sound environments | Very good correlation with perceived sound intensity and sound pleasantness | |
L10, 10% percentile level [23,24,25] | Describes contribution of loudest events | Outperforms LAeq to describe perception of high noise levels | |
Spectrum and source related indicators | Sound ecology indicators: NDSI, normalized difference soundscape index; ACI, acoustic complexity in; entropy; BIO, bioacoustic index; ADI, acoustic diversity index; AEI, acoustic evenness index [11,26] | Good for discriminating presence of biophonic sounds and anthropogenic sounds in urban sound | Likely to be correlated with the time presence of the described sound sources |
The normalized time and frequency second derivative: TFSDmean, 4k Hz (birds); TFSDmean,500 Hz (human voices) [27,28] |
Can be computed from octave band 1 s dataset. Good for discriminating presence of biophonic sounds and anthropogenic sounds in urban sound environment | Likely to be correlated with the time presence of the described sound sources | |
Leq (63 Hz–500 Hz); 1/3 octave band continuous sound pressure level [28,29] | Good for discriminating sound environments frequency content | Correlated with the time presence of Traffic | |
LCeq-LAeq, difference between A- and C-weighted equivalent continuous sound levels [30,31,32,33,34] | Describes the amount of low frequencies | Differences of 15 to 20 dB show an effect on annoyance and perception of vibrations | |
Emergences and noise variation indicators | LAmax, maximum A-weighted noise level; NA, number of events above a threshold; time above a threshold [35,36] | NA80, number of events above a 80 dBA, or TA80 time above 80 dBA (additional thresholds can be considered) | Awakening probability with increasing LAmax The number of high noise level events may affect sleep motility. For aircraft noise, also an effect on annoyance is suggested |
Calculated from percentiles. Fluctuation: defined as the difference between the (single) source event and the source background level. Emergence: Difference between the source event and the overall background level (L10–L90 or L1–L99) [37,38,39,40,41,42] | Good description of the energetic increase produced by a source | Field investigations on annoyance and hypertension yield some support in the context of mixed sound exposure and low background levels (main roads). No consensus concerning the perceptive effects | |
Intermittency ratio (IR). Ratio between the sound energy contributions of events, and the overall contributions during the measurement period [43,44,45,46] | Expresses the energetic share of noise exposure created by individual noise events | Highly intermittent nocturnal noise is correlated with increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. In a fully adjusted hypertension model the IR made an additional contribution beyond the Lden in mixed source exposure situations. IR has an additional effect on %HA and can explain shifts of the exposure-response curve of up to about 6 dB. |