Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 24;17(12):4555. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124555

Table 2.

Multivariable adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of the prevalence of physical and comprehensive frailty according to the color-changing chewing gum score a.

Color-Changing Chewing Gum Score p for Trend b
5
(n = 320)
4
(n = 563)
3
(n = 163)
1 + 2
(n = 60)
Physical
Case (n (%)) 22 (6.9) 60 (10.7) 29 (17.8) 19 (31.7)
Model 1 c 1.00 (Ref) 1.44 (0.85 to 2.44) 2.01 (1.08 to 3.73) 3.97 (1.90 to 8.29) <0.001
Model 2 d 1.00 (Ref) 1.47 (0.85 to 2.55) 1.95 (1.02 to 3.72) 3.96 (1.79 to 8.74) <0.001
Model 3 e 1.00 (Ref) 1.44 (0.83 to 2.51) 1.94 (1.01 to 3.74) 3.64 (1.62 to 8.18) 0.001
Comprehensive
Case (n (%)) 65 (20.3) 154 (27.4) 61 (37.4) 29 (48.3)
Model 1 c 1.00 (Ref) 1.40 (1.00 to 1.98) 1.86 (1.19 to 2.89) 2.52 (1.37 to 4.61) <0.001
Model 2 d 1.00 (Ref) 1.43 (1.00 to 2.06) 1.70 (1.07 to 2.70) 2.27 (1.19 to 4.33) <0.001
Model 3 e 1.00 (Ref) 1.39 (0.97 to 2.01) 1.65 (1.03 to 2.64) 2.09 (1.09 to 4.03) 0.009

Abbreviation: a All values were counts (%) or relative odds ratio (95% confidence interval). All estimates are derived from multivariable logistic regression models. Fried phenotype model-based physical frailty is defined according to the Japanese version of the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria. The Kihon Checklist-based comprehensive frailty is defined as a score of 7 or above; b Linear trend p-values are calculated with the likelihood ratio test using ordinal variable (color-changing chewing gum score) values. Bolded p-values are statistically significant (p < 0.05); c Model 1 was adjusted for age (continuous), sex (woman or man), and population density (≥1000 or <1000 people/km2); d Model 2 included variables from model 1 as well as adjustment for BMI (continuous), physical activity (yes or no), smoking status (never smoker, past smoker, or current smoker), alcohol status (drinker or nondrinker), educational attainment (<9, 10–12, or ≥13 years), medications prescribed (continuous), living alone (yes or no), socioeconomic status (high or low), and history of disease (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, heart disease, and stroke; yes or no); e Model 3 included variables from model 2 plus adjustment for denture use (yes or no) and daily teeth brushing (yes or no).