Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 24;17(12):4555. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124555

Table 4.

Multivariable adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of the prevalence of each component of the KCL according to the score of color-changing chewing gum a.

Color-Changing Chewing Gum Score p for Trend b
5
(n = 320)
4
(n = 563)
3
(n = 163)
1 + 2
(n = 60)
IADL disability
Case (n (%)) 8 (2.5) 34 (6.0) 7 (4.3) 4 (6.7)
Model 1 c 1.00 (Ref) 2.22 (1.00 to 4.96) 0.94 (0.30 to 2.99) 1.30 (0.32 to 5.27) 0.986
Model 2 d 1.00 (Ref) 2.35 (1.02 to 5.40) 0.84 (0.25 to 2.82) 1.23 (0.28 to 5.49) 0.900
Model 3 e 1.00 (Ref) 2.35 (1.02 to 5.44) 0.84 (0.25 to 2.85) 1.25 (0.27 to 5.80) 0.898
Physical
Case (n (%)) 42 (13.1) 90 (16.0) 32 (19.5) 8 (13.3)
Model 1 c 1.00 (Ref) 1.19 (0.78 to 1.81) 1.19 (0.69 to 2.05) 0.66 (0.28 to 1.57) 0.787
Model 2 d 1.00 (Ref) 1.20 (0.77 to 1.87) 1.15 (0.65 to 2.03) 0.63 (0.25 to 1.56) 0.711
Model 3 e 1.00 (Ref) 1.20 (0.77 to 1.87) 1.19 (0.67 to 2.11) 0.61 (0.24 to 1.55) 0.729
Nutrition
Case (n (%)) 2 (0.6) 13 (2.3) 2 (1.2) 4 (6.7)
Model 1 c 1.00 (Ref) 3.85 (0.85 to 17.32) 1.71 (0.23 to 12.50) 6.03 (0.94 to 38.59) 0.174
Model 2 d 1.00 (Ref) 5.50 (0.94 to 32.29) 1.80 (0.19 to 17.56) 3.18 (0.35 to 28.61) 0.663
Model 3 e 1.00 (Ref) 6.72 (1.06 to 42.82) 2.94 (0.27 to 31.73) 4.06 (0.39 to 41.73) 0.486
Oral
Case (n (%)) 56 (17.5) 116 (20.6) 50 (30.5) 26 (43.3)
Model 1 c 1.00 (Ref) 1.23 (0.85 to 1.76) 1.80 (1.13 to 2.86) 2.91 (1.59 to 5.35) <0.001
Model 2 d 1.00 (Ref) 1.17 (0.81 to 1.71) 1.69 (1.05 to 2.72) 2.56 (1.36 to 4.82) 0.001
Model 3 e 1.00 (Ref) 1.09 (0.74 to 1.59) 1.47 (0.91 to 2.398) 2.20 (1.15 to 4.19) 0.011
Social
Case (n (%)) 11 (3.4) 28 (5.0) 15 (9.2) 5 (8.3)
Model 1 c 1.00 (Ref) 1.37 (0.67 to 2.82) 2.19 (0.95 to 5.06) 1.80 (0.58 to 5.60) 0.094
Model 2 d 1.00 (Ref) 1.37 (0.65 to 2.88) 2.11 (0.88 to 5.03) 1.69 (0.52 to 5.51) 0.138
Model 3 e 1.00 (Ref) 1.32 (0.62 to 2.80) 2.02 (0.83 to 4.89) 1.51 (0.45 to 5.10) 0.202
Cognitive
Case (n (%)) 104 (32.4) 183 (32.5) 53 (32.3) 17 (28.3)
Model 1 c 1.00 (Ref) 1.03 (0.76 to 1.38) 0.96 (0.63 to 1.46) 0.73 (0.39 to 1.36) 0.465
Model 2 d 1.00 (Ref) 1.01 (0.74 to 1.37) 0.89 (0.58 to 1.36) 0.66 (0.35 to 1.24) 0.252
Model 3 e 1.00 (Ref) 0.99 (0.72 to 1.34) 0.86 (0.56 to 1.33) 0.62 (0.32 to 1.18) 0.183
Depression
Case (n (%)) 66 (20.6) 123 (21.9) 52 (31.7) 22 (36.7)
Model 1 c 1.00 (Ref) 1.07 (0.76 to 1.51) 1.57 (1.00 to 2.45) 1.69 (1.12 to 3.15) 0.004
Model 2 d 1.00 (Ref) 1.06 (0.74 to 1.51) 1.48 (0.93 to 2.35) 1.59 (1.05 to 2.90) 0.019
Model 3 e 1.00 (Ref) 1.02 (0.71 to 1.47) 1.45 (0.91 to 2.32) 1.58 (1.04 to 2.90) 0.024

Abbreviations: IADL = instrumental activities of daily living; KCL = Kihon Checklist; a All values were counts (%) or relative odds ratio (95% confidence interval). All estimates are derived from multivariable logistic regression models; b Linear trend p-values are calculated with the likelihood ratio test using ordinal variable (color-changing chewing gum score) values. Bolded p-values are statistically significant (p < 0.05); c Model 1 was adjusted for age (continuous), sex (woman or man), and population density (≥1000 or <1000 people/km2); d Model 2 included variables from model 1 as well as adjustment for BMI (continuous), physical activity (yes or no), smoking status (never smoker, past smoker, or current smoker), alcohol status (drinker or nondrinker), educational attainment (<9, 10–12, or ≥13 years), medications prescribed (continuous), living alone (yes or no), socioeconomic status (high or low), and history of disease (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, heart disease, and stroke; yes or no); e Model 3 included variables from model 2 plus adjustment for denture use (yes or no) and daily teeth brushing (yes or no).