Table 1.
Performance comparison of three image synthesis algorithms. The best results of each subject are presented in bold.
Sub | MAE | CC | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCM_based | FCN_based | CAE-GAN | FCM_based | FCN_based | CAE-GAN | |
1 | 157.81 | 77.11 | 58.88 | 0.75 | 0.94 | 0.96 |
2 | 176.91 | 95.24 | 98.44 | 0.61 | 0.91 | 0.89 |
3 | 157.94 | 99.77 | 69.99 | 0.71 | 0.90 | 0.92 |
4 | 178.49 | 87.34 | 67.49 | 0.74 | 0.92 | 0.93 |
5 | 165.03 | 103.34 | 99.32 | 0.70 | 0.89 | 0.89 |
6 | 152.67 | 105.57 | 97.54 | 0.71 | 0.89 | 0.89 |
7 | 169.38 | 82.08 | 78.96 | 0.67 | 0.92 | 0.93 |
8 | 146.57 | 94.91 | 71.76 | 0.67 | 0.89 | 0.92 |
9 | 171.82 | 110.18 | 88.94 | 0.79 | 0.88 | 0.90 |