Table 2.
Performance comparison between our proposed method and other registration methods. The best results are presented in bold.
| Sub | MI | SLPD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ours | D_Morphons | D_Demons | Ours | D_Morphons | D_Demons | |
| 1 | 0.9482 | 0.9465 | 0.9466 | 1.6159E + 05 | 1.6803E + 05 | 1.7738E + 05 |
| 2 | 0.9220 | 0.9177 | 0.9161 | 2.6173E + 04 | 4.1678E + 04 | 2.9328E + 04 |
| 3 | 0.9338 | 0.9307 | 0.9328 | 1.9668E + 04 | 1.1733E + 05 | 5.8928E + 04 |
| 4 | 0.9397 | 0.9340 | 0.9386 | 6.0200E + 04 | 7.6741E + 04 | 9.0167E + 04 |
| 5 | 0.9251 | 0.9184 | 0.9238 | 1.0450E + 05 | 1.3337E + 05 | 1.5216E + 05 |
| 6 | 0.9316 | 0.9456 | 0.9311 | 9.4646E + 04 | 8.2707E + 04 | 9.2987E + 04 |
| 7 | 0.9437 | 0.9378 | 0.9435 | 1.1808E + 05 | 1.3797E + 05 | 1.2557E + 05 |
| 8 | 0.9414 | 0.9348 | 0.9411 | 1.4943E + 05 | 1.6041E + 05 | 1.8494E + 05 |
| 9 | 0.9286 | 0.9271 | 0.9278 | 4.3636E + 04 | 1.6514E + 05 | 7.6691E + 04 |