Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 5;12(11):10211–10222. doi: 10.18632/aging.103403

Table 2. The relationship between, pre-treatment measurements of ovarian response predictors and outcome (retrieval of a mature oocyte) after PRP treatment.

AFC PRIOR TO PRP <35 years old (N/Total (%)) 35-37 years old (N/Total (%)) 38-40 years old (N/Total (%)) All ages (N/Total (%))
0a 11/73 (15.1%)* 9/37 (24.3%) 14/65 (21.5%)* 34/175 (19.4%)*
1 and 2b 19/34 (55.9%)* 10/25 (40.0%) 21/38 (55.3%)* 50/97 (51.5%)*
AMH PRIOR TO PRP <35 years old (N/Total (%)) 35-37 years old (N/Total (%)) 38-40 years old (N/Total (%)) All ages (N/Total (%))
<25th percentilec (0.01-0.02 ng/mL) 2/34 (5.9%) 4/15 (26.7%) 11/37 (29.7%) 17/86 (19.8%)
25th -100th percentiled (0.03-0.82 ng/mL) 28/73 (38.4%) 15/47 (31.9%) 24/66 (36.4%) 67/186 (36.0%)
FSH PRIOR TO PRP <35 years old (N/Total (%)) 35-37 years old (N/Total (%)) 38-40 years old (N/Total (%)) All ages (N/Total (%))
>75thpercentilee (44.2-155 mIU/mL) 1/30 (3.3%) 2/12 (16.7%) 2/26 (7.7%) 5/68 (7.4%)
0th -75th percentilef (25-44.1 mIU/mL) 29/77 (37.7%) 17/50 (34.0%) 33/77 (42.9%) 79/204 (38.7%)
TOTAL 30/107 (28.0%) 19/62 (30.6%) 35/103 (34.0%) 84/272 (30.9%)

Table shows the number of women who had at least one mature oocyte retrieved per women treated in each age group. Data shown as grouped according to pre-treatment AFC, AMH OR FSH. All women who participated in the study were included (n=311), except those who conceived spontaneously (n=23) and those who did not have all parameters recorded (n=16). *: p<0.05 in the age group according to pre-treatment AFC (0 vs 1 or 2); : p<0.05 in the age group according to pre-treatment AMH (<25th percentile vs 25th-100th percentile); : p<0.05 in the age group according to pre-treatment FSH (>75th percentile vs 0th-75th percentile).