Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 5;12(11):10211–10222. doi: 10.18632/aging.103403

Table 3. The relationship between pre-treatment measurements of ovarian response predictors and outcome (obtaining a cleavage stage embryo) after PRP treatment.

AFC PRIOR TO PRP <35 years old (N/Total (%)) 35-37 years old (N/Total (%)) 38-40 years old (N/Total (%)) All ages (N/Total (%))
0 9/73 (12.3%)* 9/37 (24.3%) 11/65 (16.9%)* 29/175 (16.6%)*
1 and 2 18/34 (52.9%)* 10/25 (40.0%) 20/38 (52.6%)* 48/97 (49.5%)*
AMH PRIOR TO PRP <35 years old (N/Total (%)) 35-37 years old (N/Total (%)) 38-40 years old (N/Total (%)) All ages (N/Total (%))
<25th percentile (0.01-0.02 ng/mL) 2/34 (5.9%) 4/15 (26.7%) 9/37 (24.3%) 15/86 (17.4%)
25th -100th percentile (0.03-0.82 ng/mL) 25/73 (34.2%) 15/47 (31.9%) 22/66 (33.3%) 62/186 (33.3%)
FSH PRIOR TO PRP <35 years old (N/Total (%)) 35-37 years old (N/Total (%)) 38-40 years old (N/Total (%)) All ages (N/Total (%))
>75thpercentile (44.2-155 mIU/mL) 1/30 (3.3%) 2/12 (16.7%) 2/26 (7.7%) 5/68 (7.4%)
0th -75th percentile (25-44.1 mIU/mL) 26/77 (33.8%) 17/50 (34.0%) 29/77 (37.7%) 72/204 (35.3%)
TOTAL 27/107 (25.2%) 19/62 (30.6%) 31/103 (30.1%) 77/272 (28.3%)

Table shows the number of women who had at least one mature oocyte retrieved per women treated in each age group. Data shown as grouped according to pre-treatment AFC, AMH OR FSH. All women who participated in the study were included (n=311), except those who conceived spontaneously (n=23) and those who did not have all parameters recorded (n=16). *: p<0.05 in the age group according to pre-treatment AFC (0 vs 1 or 2); †: p<0.05 in the age group according to pre-treatment AMH (<25th percentile vs 25th-100th percentile); ‡: p<0.05 in the age group according to pre-treatment FSH (>75th percentile vs 0th-75th percentile).