Table 1.
Session no. | Session objective | Tasks | Activities | Measure of aim met | Measure of participation process |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 (1.5 h) | Develop a shared understanding of influencers of continued practice and capacity | Re-establish team cohesion | Warm-up by FaPMI coordinator | ||
Review collected data Practitioner use Implementation journey Implementation documents |
Review practitioner data—phase 2 and current data Review assumptions and ideas raised in implementation journey activity Create space for further questions to be raised |
More questions raised |
Analysis of sticky notes Framelaps and audio End of session feedback form |
||
Introduce the Generic conceptual framework for sustainability used for coding | Gave a rationale for using General conceptual framework for sustainability for coding data from implementation journey activity and presented developing theme matrix | ||||
Identify influencers of continued practice |
Each brainstorm with own sticky notes (initial at bottom). Different colour for practice and capacity Place on the wall so can be seen by all Cluster influencers into categories using group consensus |
Matrix of influencers | |||
Identify influencers of continued capacity | |||||
3 (1.5 h) | Compare key influencers to literature | Re-establish team cohesion | Warm-up | Refined theme matrix with descriptions matching data |
Framelaps and audio Work done in each pair End of session feedback form |
Present established frameworks that have shaped the theme matrix | Present the CFIR, Active Implementation Frameworks and refresh re General conceptual framework for sustainability | ||||
Review and refine developing themes matrix |
Pairs reviewed a section of themes, their description and data to check: Themes reflected the data If the themes picked up on what they had wanted to convey about key influencers Decide if theme should be kept, rolled into another or removed |