Table 2. NAM-Style Populations in Maize and Other Crops.
Crop | No. of Families | Total Progeny | Mean Family Size | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Maize (United States) | 25 | 5,000 | 200 | (Yu et al., 2008) |
Maize (China) | 11 | 1,971 | 154 | (Li et al., 2015) |
Dent maize (Europe) | 11 | 919 | 91 | (Bauer et al., 2013) |
Flint maize (Europe) | 13 | 1,009 | 97 | (Bauer et al., 2013) |
Teosinte/maize | 5 | 1,257 | 251 | (Chen et al., 2019) |
Rice | 10 | 1,879 | 181 | (Fragoso et al., 2017) |
Wheat | 10 | 852 | 85 | (Bajgain et al., 2016) |
Wheat | 60 | 6,268 | 105 | (Wingen et al., 2017) |
Wheat | 50 | 6,280 | 126 | (Kidane et al., 2019) |
Sorghum | 10 | 2,214 | 221 | (Bouchet et al., 2017) |
Barley | 5 | 295 | 59 | (Schnaithmann et al., 2014) |
Barley | 25 | 1,420 | 57 | (Maurer et al., 2015) |
Soybean | 40 | 5,600 | 140 | (Song et al., 2017) |
Rapeseed | 15 | 2,141 | 143 | (Hu et al., 2018) |
Populations designed in the style of the original maize NAM varied in terms of the number of biparental populations and the number of progeny in each population.