Table 2.
Condition variables | Outcome variables and their decisive factor |
Description | Research literature | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Survival | Death | |||||
Dynamic capability(Winter, 2003) | Government Support (GS) |
✓ | ✓ | There are supporting behaviors → code 1 There is no supporting behavior → code 0 |
[58] | |
Universities Cooperation(UC) |
✓ | ✓ | There is cooperative R&D with universities → code 1 There is no cooperative R&D with universities→ code 0 |
[59] | ||
Technology Introduction(TI) | ✓ | ✓ | There is introduction of advanced technology → code 1 There is no introduction of advanced technology → code 0 |
[60] | ||
Resource-based capacity [39] |
Talent Reserve(TR) | ✓ | Enterprises attach importance to the construction of team personnel → code 1 Enterprises do not pay attention to the construction of team personnel → code 0 |
[46] [47] |
||
R&D Expenditure(R&D) | ✓ | ✓ | High R&D input →code 1 Low R&D input → code 0 |
[73] [49] |
||
Patents Number(PN) |
✓ | Fuzzy set membership is treated as 5%, 50%, 95% | [10] [45] |
|||
Enterprise 0wnership(EO) | ✓ | State-owned enterprises → code 1 Private enterprises →code 0 |
[44] | |||
Product Competition(PC) | ✓ | ✓ | The product has the economic benefit → code 1 The product has environmental benefit → code 0 |
[43] | ||
Sustainable Innovation(SI) |
✓ | ✓ | There is sustainable Innovation → code 1 There is no sustainable innovation →code 0 |
(Tsvetkova et al., 2014) |