Table 6.
Multi-factor combination path analysis of enterprise death.
| Configuration | Solution |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Dynamic capability view | ||||
| GS | ⊗ | ● | ||
| UC | ⊗ | ⊗ | ● | |
| TI | ⊗ | ⊗ | ● | |
| Resource-based view | ||||
| R&D | ● | ⊗ | ⊗ | |
| PC | ⊗ | ⊗ | ||
| SI | ⊗ | |||
| Consistency | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Raw coverage | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.14 | |
| Unique coverage | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.14 | |
| Overall solution consistency | 1 | |||
| Overall solution coverage | 0.57 | |||
Note: ● indicates that the condition variable exists, ⊗indicates that the condition variable is missing, the large circle represents the core element, and the small circle represents the peripheral element. “Blank” indicates that the condition may or may not appear in the path.