Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 6;8:e9470. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9470

Table 6. The testing results of CNN_3, CNN_4, and HSplice performed on the donor sites of the combined dataset.

The testing results performed on 20% of each hold-out set of the donor sites.

Site Evaluation Metrics Model Ratio
1:1 1:3 1:5 1:7
Donor AUPRC CNN_3 0.795 0.846 0.891 0.935
CNN_4 0.798 0.847 0.892 0.934
HSplice 0.551 0.527 0.686 0.594
Precision CNN_3 0.394 0.615 0.760 0.889
CNN_4 0.387 0.561 0.708 0.850
HSplice 0.290 0.327 0.443 0.539
Recall CNN_3 0.960 0.919 0.888 0.854
CNN_4 0.962 0.940 0.922 0.903
HSplice 0.927 0.813 0.909 0.660
MCC CNN_3 0.599 0.740 0.810 0.856
CNN_4 0.594 0.713 0.795 0.861
HSplice 0.496 0.487 0.606 0.542

Notes.

Bold styling emphasizes the highest values regarding the evaluation metrics used in the study.