Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Physiol. 2020 May 21;598(13):2589–2605. doi: 10.1113/JP278503

Table 4.

LV function stiffness during cardiac loading and unloading

Middle-age untrained Older untrained Older trained ANOVA p value
Individual static LV chamber stiffness constant 0.065 (0.049 - 0.080) 0.085 (0.061 - 0.138) 0.047 (0.031 - 0.054)# <0.001
Dynamic operating stiffness during LV unloading, ∆mmHg/∆ml/m2 0.47 (0.38 - 0.55) 0.58 (0.36 - 0.81) 0.41 (0.30 - 0.44) 0.016
Dynamic operating stiffness during LV loading, ∆mmHg/∆ml/m2 1.10 (0.78 - 1.55) (20) 2.28 (1.20 - 3.83) (34)* 1.08 (0.95 - 1.62) (12) <0.001

Nonparametric sampling distributions are shown as median (25% - 75%). Data was analysed by Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA on Ranks with post hoc analysis (Dunn’s method). The single number in parentheses represents the number of observations if different from the stated n in Table 1.

LV, left ventricular

*

p <0.05 older trained versus middle-age untrained

p <0.05 older trained versus older untrained

#

p =0.053 older trained versus middle-age untrained