Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 7;9(3):3. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.3.3

Table 3.

Comparison of Retinal Layer Thickness

Control Post-PRP PDR
Thickness (µm) Baseline Follow-up P value Baseline Follow-up P value P value*
Fovea
 NFL 18.84 ± 1.15 17.65 ± 0.68 0.003 20.25 ± 4.79 20.88 ± 4.98 0.502 0.006
 GC/IPL 39.57 ± 13.52 39.94 ± 13.43 0.477 40.28 ± 11.34 36.70 ± 13.22 0.018 0.515
 INL 23.39 ± 6.84 23.39 ± 7.69 0.635 29.20 ± 6.24 30.12 ± 11.57 0.606 0.092
 OP/ONL 139.55 ± 10.74 138.86 ± 9.22 0.386 141.24 ± 25.52 135.76 ± 28.06 0.072 0.642
 IS/OS 38.39 ± 1.96 37.47 ± 1.55 0.075 32.80 ± 9.28 32.30 ± 9.41 0.139 0.006
 RPE 31.03 ± 3.28 30.12 ± 4.18 0.075 28.58 ± 3.83 28.51 ± 3.75 0.911 0.273
Parafovea
 NFL 27.66 ± 1.77 27.56 ± 1.80 0.722 33.87 ± 5.98 33.29 ± 5.66 0.445 <0.001
 GC/IPL 93.67 ± 8.14 91.75 ± 7.08 0.013 86.79 ± 12.00 83.63 ± 12.89 0.005 0.062
 INL 39.92 ± 3.86 39.79 ± 4.60 0.722 39.05 ± 5.87 38.97 ± 5.84 0.733 0.688
 OP/ONL 118.28 ± 4.88 117.50 ± 4.93 0.033 123.60 ± 15.46 122.77 ± 14.46 0.592 0.134
 IS/OS 33.31 ± 1.98 33.17 ± 2.03 0.657 30.30 ± 5.79 29.70 ± 6.02 0.088 0.026
 RPE 30.66 ± 2.96 29.87 ± 3.03 0.155 26.63 ± 3.20 26.86 ± 3.22 0.783 0.015
Perifovea
 NFL 41.46 ± 5.17 40.73 ± 5.08 0.213 52.17 ± 9.50 50.90 ± 9.63 0.200 <0.001
 GC/IPL 64.05 ± 5.08 63.12 ± 4.67 0.182 67.12 ± 7.25 66.10 ± 7.15 0.322 0.222
 INL 30.44 ± 2.53 30.19 ± 2.69 0.328 31.40 ± 5.09 31.59 ± 5.39 0.884 0.895
 OP/ONL 95.96 ± 6.85 95.24 ± 6.80 0.033 103.37 ± 10.71 103.84 ± 10.12 0.709 0.009
 IS/OS 34.02 ± 2.96 34.10 ± 1.67 0.722 29.64 ± 4.85 29.16 ± 5.08 0.131 <0.001
 RPE 27.46 ± 4.63 26.72 ± 3.83 0.374 25.48 ± 2.94 25.41 ± 4.08 0.783 0.384

INL, inner nuclear layer; OP/ONL, outer plexiform/outer nuclear layer; RPE, retinal pigmented epithelium.

Even after 5 years, diabetic patients treated with PRP still had pathologic changes in the NFL and IS/OS. They also showed progressive thinning of GC/IPL over time.

*

Compared the results at the follow-up visit between control and diabetic patients.