(
A) The effective spike rate of fast, intermediate and slow motor neurons, over the course of all trials with spontaneous leg movements. Instantaneous spike rates could be much higher. (
B) From the 2D spike-triggered phase histograms and Bayes’ rule, we calculated a likelihood function in order to compare spiking regimes in different neurons. If the force probe has a particular position, p, and velocity, q, the likelihood that a motor neuron fired a spike in the preceding 25 ms (right column, linear color scale from 0 to 1) is given by the number of frames with p,q that follow a spike (middle column, shown in
Figure 5) divided by the full distribution of p,q (left column). The centroids of the full histograms (left column) are shown in
Figure 5. (
C) Comparison of activity in recordings of pairs of motor neurons: the number of EMG spikes preceded by a spike in the whole-cell recording, i.e. in a neuron lower down the recruitment hierarchy. The left hand axis indicates the probability of a spike in each millisecond bin for 30 ms before the EMG spike. The right hand axis indicates the cumulative probability of observing a spike in the period before the EMG spike. We found that a small number of intermediate neurons were not preceded by slow neuron spikes (N = 110/3082 spikes). (
D) An example trial in which the normal recruitment hierarchy was violated, which only occurred when the leg was unloaded (tibia angle, bottom). During rapid shaking of the leg (highlighted region), the intermediate neuron could spike before the slow motor neuron and have a higher instantaneous spike rate.