Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Biol Eng Comput. 2020 May 26;58(8):1651–1665. doi: 10.1007/s11517-020-02183-z

Fig.7. Comparison of reconstructed uterine surface electrograms using three regularization methods.

Fig.7.

Simulated and reconstructed electrograms (0 to 10 s) from the indicated sites A to D. CC and RE values are labeled on the top of each electrogram panel. The average noise level of the BSPMs used is 15%.