Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 9;9(7):66. doi: 10.1038/s41389-020-00250-6

Table 1.

Summary of literature addressing the association of CMS(-like) subtypes with therapy response.

Therapy composition Reference Trial/Cohort Samples Stage Treatment Main results
Chemotherapy only Roepman et al.71 Local cohort 222 Stage III No adjuvant therapy vs. 5-FU-based therapy Epithelial B-type benefits from chemotherapy, mesenchymal C-type does not.
Song et al.141 NASBP C-07 1729 Stage II and III Leucovorin and 5-FU ± Oxaliplatin Addition of oxaliplatin only benefits CMS2(-like) patients
Okita et al.145 Local cohort 193 Metastatic Irinotecan-based vs. Oxaliplatin-based CMS4 benefits from irinotecan-based therapy
Allena, Dunnea et al.142 Local cohort Marisa et al.68 156, 479 Stage II and III No adjuvant therapy vs. 5-FU-based therapy Only stage II and III CMS2 and stage III CMS3 benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy
Cetuximab De Sousa e Meloa, Wanga et al.66, Sadanandam et al.67 Khambata-Forda, Garretta et al.132 110 Metastatic No therapy vs. cetuximab mono therapy No benefit for cetuximab in KRAS wildtype mesenchymal CCS3/stem-like subtypes, only in CCS1/TA-like epithelial subtypes.
Chemo- plus targeted therapy Mooi et al.74 AGITG MAX 237 Metastatic Capecitabine vs. Capecitabine + Bevacizumab (± Mitomycin) Bevacizumab use only benefits CMS2 and possibly CMS3.
Smeets et al.134 ANGIOPREDICT, CAIRO149 204, 205 Metastatic Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy ± Bevacizumab CIN-intermediate/high (enriched for CMS2 & CMS4) benefit from bevacizumab, CIN-low (enriched for CMS1 & CMS3) do not.
Trinh et al.137 CAIRO213 311 Metastatic Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin + Bevacizumab ± Cetuximab Benefit cetuximab only observed in KRAS wildtype epithelial (CMS2 & CMS3) group, not in mesenchymal (CMS4) group.
Stintzing et al.135,136 FIRE3 315 Metastatic FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab or + Cetuximab Cetuximab yields more benefit than bevacizumab in CMS4.
Lenz et al.75 CALGB/SWOG 80405 581 Metastatic ~75% FOLFOX, ~25% FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab or + Cetuximab Bevacizumab yields more benefit than cetuximab in CMS1. Cetuximab yields more benefit than bevacizumab in CMS2.

Main characteristics of studies are listed, as well as the most notable outcomes. Superscripted numbers refer to original publication.

vs. versus.

aIndicates shared first authorship.