Table 1.
Therapy composition | Reference | Trial/Cohort | Samples | Stage | Treatment | Main results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chemotherapy only | Roepman et al.71 | Local cohort | 222 | Stage III | No adjuvant therapy vs. 5-FU-based therapy | Epithelial B-type benefits from chemotherapy, mesenchymal C-type does not. |
Song et al.141 | NASBP C-07 | 1729 | Stage II and III | Leucovorin and 5-FU ± Oxaliplatin | Addition of oxaliplatin only benefits CMS2(-like) patients | |
Okita et al.145 | Local cohort | 193 | Metastatic | Irinotecan-based vs. Oxaliplatin-based | CMS4 benefits from irinotecan-based therapy | |
Allena, Dunnea et al.142 | Local cohort Marisa et al.68 | 156, 479 | Stage II and III | No adjuvant therapy vs. 5-FU-based therapy | Only stage II and III CMS2 and stage III CMS3 benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy | |
Cetuximab | De Sousa e Meloa, Wanga et al.66, Sadanandam et al.67 | Khambata-Forda, Garretta et al.132 | 110 | Metastatic | No therapy vs. cetuximab mono therapy | No benefit for cetuximab in KRAS wildtype mesenchymal CCS3/stem-like subtypes, only in CCS1/TA-like epithelial subtypes. |
Chemo- plus targeted therapy | Mooi et al.74 | AGITG MAX | 237 | Metastatic | Capecitabine vs. Capecitabine + Bevacizumab (± Mitomycin) | Bevacizumab use only benefits CMS2 and possibly CMS3. |
Smeets et al.134 | ANGIOPREDICT, CAIRO149 | 204, 205 | Metastatic | Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy ± Bevacizumab | CIN-intermediate/high (enriched for CMS2 & CMS4) benefit from bevacizumab, CIN-low (enriched for CMS1 & CMS3) do not. | |
Trinh et al.137 | CAIRO213 | 311 | Metastatic | Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin + Bevacizumab ± Cetuximab | Benefit cetuximab only observed in KRAS wildtype epithelial (CMS2 & CMS3) group, not in mesenchymal (CMS4) group. | |
Stintzing et al.135,136 | FIRE3 | 315 | Metastatic | FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab or + Cetuximab | Cetuximab yields more benefit than bevacizumab in CMS4. | |
Lenz et al.75 | CALGB/SWOG 80405 | 581 | Metastatic | ~75% FOLFOX, ~25% FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab or + Cetuximab | Bevacizumab yields more benefit than cetuximab in CMS1. Cetuximab yields more benefit than bevacizumab in CMS2. |
Main characteristics of studies are listed, as well as the most notable outcomes. Superscripted numbers refer to original publication.
vs. versus.
aIndicates shared first authorship.