Table 2.
Assessment of the probability of lung cancer on the basis of the 2D:4D ratio in a group of women.
| Predictor | Rating | Standard error | 95% CI for rating | OR | 95% CI for OR | p | R2 Nagelkerke |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2D:4D R | − 15.79 | 7.48 | − 30.45 | − 1.13 | 1.38E−7 | 5.94E−14 | 3.21E−1 | 0.035 | 0.545 |
| 2D:4D L | − 4.48 | 6.95 | − 18.09 | 9.14 | 0.01 | 1.39E−8 | 9.36E+3 | 0.52 | 0.521 |
| Δ2D:4D | − 10.19 | 7.04 | − 23.99 | 3.62 | 3.8E−5 | 3.8E−11 | 3.73E+1 | 0.148 | 0.528 |
Correlations of 2D:4D with the probability of lung ca were tested in separate models adjusted for smoking.
OR odds ratio, p probability for Wald test checking regression parameters’ relevance, R2 Nagelkerke a measure of model fit to the data. Bold font indicates statistical significance.