Table 4.
First-order exploratory factor analysis with oblimin rotation.
| Items | Extracted factors |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 |
8 |
9 |
|
| F | Cs | Su | |
| F 133∗ | -0.866 | ||
| F 146 | 0.866 | ||
| F 9∗ | -0.865 | ||
| F 72∗ | -0.864 | ||
| F 30∗ | -0.864 | ||
| F 81∗ | -0.863 | ||
| F 170 | 0.862 | ||
| F 120 | 0.860 | ||
| F 71∗ | -0.858 | ||
| F 6 | 0.856 | ||
| F 167∗ | -0.848 | ||
| F 98∗ | -0.844 | ||
| F 174∗ | -0.841 | ||
| F 112∗ | -0.779 | ||
| Cs 32 | 0.781 | ||
| Cs 57 | 0.745 | ||
| Cs 3 | 0.735 | ||
| Cs 46 | 0.689 | ||
| Cs 90 | 0.678 | ||
| Cs 24 | 0.667 | ||
| Cs 65 | 0.442 | ||
| Su 4 | 0.988 | ||
| Su 22 | 0.985 | ||
| Su 41 | 0.982 | ||
| Su 109 | 0.980 | ||
| Su 80 | 0.975 | ||
| Su 95 | 0.955 | ||
| Su 51 | 0.946 | ||
| Eigenvalue | 6.415 | 5.586 | 4.681 |
Note: Factor loadings under 0.4 were eliminated (N = 3,224). F= Fraud; Cs= Substance Use; Su= Suggestibility. ∗Items are scored in reverse.