Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 7;6(7):e04327. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04327

Table 1.

A comparison of the achievement of diverse immunodevices for PSA identification.

Detection method Used materials Detection Range LOD Reference
Cantilever Antigen-Antibody reaction 0.2–60 μg/cm3 1 mg/cm3 [25]
Electrochemical (CV) Graphene (GR)-based gold (Au) composite 0–10 ng/cm3 0.59 ng/cm3 [26]
Electrochemical (DPV) SiO2- AgNPs/Ab/BSA/Ag 0.03–0.001 μg/cm3 0.001 μg/cm3 [27]
Amperometric Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs 0.5–5 ng/cm3 0.5 ng/cm3 [28]
Surface Plasmon Resonance Sandwich assay 0.29–2.3 ng/cm3 0.2 ng/cm3 [29]
Amperometric Peptide nanotube/AuNPs/PANI modified electrode. Sandwich assay. HRP as label. 1–100 ng/cm3 0.68 ng/cm3 [30]
Capillary-based Pt@AuNPs Sandwich assay 0.02–2.5 ng/cm3 0.044 ng/cm3 [31]
Chemiluminescence Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). 0.08–5 ng/cm3 8 × 10−13 g/cm3 [32]
Electrochemical (DPV) ivory sheet/citrate- AgNPs-GQDs nano-ink/CysA-Au NPs/Ab1/BSA/PSA/Ab2 0.07–60 μg/cm3 0.07 μg/cm3 This work
photographic paper/citrate- AgNPs-GQDs nano-ink/CysA-Au NPs/Ab1/BSA/PSA/Ab2 0.05–10 μg/cm3 0.05 μg/cm3