TABLE 2.
Sample characteristics for the participants with and without visual disability.
Gender | Age | Social status | ||
Sample | (N = 249) | (N = 249) | (N = 212) | |
Blind | Male: N = 25 (39.1%) | M = 13.21 | SES1 (township) | N = 11 (20.4%) |
(N = 64) | Female: N = 39 (60.9%) | (SD = 2.67) | SES2 (lower class) | N = 22 (40.7%) |
SES3 (middle class) | N = 20 (37.0%) | |||
SES4 (upper class) | N = 10 (1.9%) | |||
Visually impaired | Male: N = 50 (56.2%) | M = 13.33 | SES1 (township) | N = 15 (20.8%) |
(N = 89) | Female: N = 39 (43.8%) | (SD = 2.68) | SES2 (lower class) | N = 27 (37.5%) |
SES3 (middle class) | N = 30 (41.7%) | |||
SES4 (upper class) | N = 0 (0.0%) | |||
Sighted | Male: N = 47 (49.0%) | M = 12.52 | SES1 (township) | N = 10 (11.6%) |
(N = 96) | Female: N = 49 (51.0%) | (SD = 3.03) | SES2 (lower class) | N = 20 (23.3%) |
SES3 (middle class) | N = 52 (60.4%) | |||
SES4 (upper class) | N = 4 (4.7%) |
N(social status) ≠ [N(blind) + N(visual. handic.) + N(sighted)] because not all participants provided information on their social status.