Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 3;11:1571. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01571

TABLE 2.

Sample characteristics for the participants with and without visual disability.

Gender Age Social status
Sample (N = 249) (N = 249) (N = 212)
Blind Male: N = 25 (39.1%) M = 13.21 SES1 (township) N = 11 (20.4%)
(N = 64) Female: N = 39 (60.9%) (SD = 2.67) SES2 (lower class) N = 22 (40.7%)
SES3 (middle class) N = 20 (37.0%)
SES4 (upper class) N = 10 (1.9%)
Visually impaired Male: N = 50 (56.2%) M = 13.33 SES1 (township) N = 15 (20.8%)
(N = 89) Female: N = 39 (43.8%) (SD = 2.68) SES2 (lower class) N = 27 (37.5%)
SES3 (middle class) N = 30 (41.7%)
SES4 (upper class) N = 0 (0.0%)
Sighted Male: N = 47 (49.0%) M = 12.52 SES1 (township) N = 10 (11.6%)
(N = 96) Female: N = 49 (51.0%) (SD = 3.03) SES2 (lower class) N = 20 (23.3%)
SES3 (middle class) N = 52 (60.4%)
SES4 (upper class) N = 4 (4.7%)

N(social status) ≠ [N(blind) + N(visual. handic.) + N(sighted)] because not all participants provided information on their social status.