Table 2.
N1 (100–160 ms) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
df | F | p value | ηp2 | Post-hoc | |
N1 peak | |||||
FP | 2,45 | 5.558 | 0.007 | 0.198 | Threatening > neutral p = 0.011 |
F | 2,45 | 5.848 | 0.006 | 0.206 | Threatening > neutral p = 0.009 |
FC | 2,45 | 4.722 | 0.014 | 0.173 | Threatening > neutral p = 0.021 |
PO | 2,45 | 4.28 | 0.02 | 0.16 | Threatening < uncertain p = 0.022 |
N1 latency | |||||
P | 2,45 | 3.979 | 0.026 | 0.15 | Threatening > neutral p = 0.023 |
PO | 2,45 | 5.971 | 0.005 | 0.21 |
Threatening > neutral p = 0.003 Threatening > uncertain p = 0.028 |
P2 (200–300 ms) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
df | F | p value | ηp2 | Post-hoc | |
P2 peak | |||||
P | 2,45 | 4.735 | 0.014 | 0.174 | Threatening > neutral p = 0.011 |
PO | 2,45 | 9.862 | 0.000 | 0.305 | Threatening > neutral p < 0.000 |
P2 latency | |||||
CP | 2,45 | 5.633 | 0.007 | 0.2 |
Threatening < neutral p = 0.048 Threatening < uncertain p = 0.009 |
P | 2,45 | 6.964 | 0.002 | 0.236 | Threatening < uncertain p = 0.002 |
PO | 2,45 | 4.918 | 0.012 | 0.179 | Threatening < neutral p = 0.027 Threatening < uncertain p = 0.021 |