Table 1.
Stages of multi-method process mapping
Stage. Goal | Sample | Method | Analytic approach |
---|---|---|---|
Stage 1. To characterize “process as envisioned” | Implementation team (including any stakeholder informing the process “as envisioned”) |
|
A priori and/or emergent coding structure in a process of coding consensus, co-occurrence, and constant comparison to characterize:
|
Stage 2. To characterize “process as realized in practice” | Frontline administrators (including any stakeholders informing process “as realized in practice”) | Semi-structured interviews, with guided process map activity | |
Stage 3. To validate study findings (optional). | Implementation team and/or frontline administrators | Focus groups, presenting process maps, and/or summary of qualitative tables (e.g., Tables 3, 4, and 5) | A priori and/or emergent coding structure to capture whether respondents are in agreement with synthesis of study findings and rationale for concordant/discordant perspective. |