Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 8;5(7):e002349. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002349

Table 3.

Adult-report and child-report of parenting outcomes using an intention-to-treat analysis and adjusting for differences at baseline*

Parent-report (n=248) Child-report (n=176)
Pre
M (SD)
Post
M (SD)
ffect
Size†
95% CI Pre
M (SD)
Post
M (SD)
Effect
Size†
95% CI
Total positive parenting Total positive parenting
 A+P 78.07 (16.43) 84.81 (14.93) 0.26 −0.10 to 0.62 A+P 86.16 (15.45) 96.20 (14.21) −0.05 −0.49 to 0.38
 A-only 78.10 (16.10) 79.99 (15.63) −0.03 −0.37 to 0.32 A-only 87.58 (15.35) 88.39 (17.82) 0.50 0.91 to −0.10
 P-only 75.68 (14.81) 82.44 (18.90) 0.20 −0.17 to 0.56 P-only 93.42 (14.70) 98.44 (11.69) −0.08 −0.50 to 0.34
 Controls 75.87 (13.33) 79.34 (17.65) Controls 93.31 (13.83) 99.10 (15.30)
Positive involvement  Positive involvement
 A+P 15.17 (7.56) 18.74 (8.58) 0.33 −0.03 to 0.69 A+P 13.99 (7.73) 17.00 (8.71) −0.18 −0.70 to 0.34
 A-only 15.11 (8.50) 15.91 (9.32) 0.03 −0.32 to 0.37 A-only 15.90 (7.39) 15.15 (10.42) −0.47 −0.95 to 0.01
 P-only 14.20 (9.21) 18.01 (11.0) 0.29 −0.08 to 0.65 P-only 16.66 (8.36) 19.78 (7.38) 0.01 −0.49 to 0.51
 Controls 15.20 (7.91) 15.69 (9.79) Controls 17.26 (7.94) 19.66 (9.82)
Positive interaction Positive interaction
 A+P 11.98 (5.22) 13.84 (5.38) 0.31 −0.05 to 0.67 A+P 10.85 (5.31) 13.43 (6.52) −0.00 −0.52 to 0.51
 A-only 12.32 (5.01) 12.32 (5.32) 0.04 −0.30 to 0.38 A-only 11.92 (5.07) 11.83 (7.23) −0.32 −0.79 to 0.15
 P-only 11.71 (5.71) 12.22 (6.46) 0.04 −0.33 to 0.40 P-only 12.48 (5.04) 14.60 (4.89) 0.10 −0.39 to 0.59
 Controls 11.13 (5.34) 11.91 (6.47) Controls 12.90 (4.66) 14.01 (6.17)
Poor supervision Poor supervision
 A+P 9.47 (5.89) 8.37 (4.64) −0.22 −0.57 to 0.14 A+P 1.37 (1.17) 1.00 (1.08) −0.15 −0.63 to 0.34
 A-only 9.79 (5.52) 9.01 (5.06) −0.10 −0.44 to 0.24 A-only 1.08 (1.18) 1.01 (1.34) −0.11 −0.56 to 0.35
 P-only 10.64 (5.64) 8.59 (4.85) −0.23 −0.59 to 0.14 P-only 0.79 (1.06) 0.91 (1.31) −0.18 −0.65 to 0.29
 Controls 10.53 (5.59) 9.64 (4.83) Controls 1.05 (1.10) 1.15 (1.50)
Inconsistent discipline Inconsistent discipline
 A+P 7.55 (3.04) 7.22 (3.80) 0.30 −0.24 to 0.83 A+P 7.58 (2.89) 7.90 (2.93) −0.13 −0.71 to 0.44
 A-only 7.49 (2.98) 6.75 (3.95) 0.21 −0.31 to 0.72 A-only 9.02 (3.06) 7.84 (4.13) −0.08 −0.61 to 0.44
 P-only 7.82 (4.18) 6.69 (3.43) 0.18 −0.35 to 0.71 P-only 7.92 (3.11) 8.31 (3.38) −0.02 −0.56 to 0.53
 Controls 7.65 (3.65) 6.01 (3.59) Controls 7.95 (2.87) 8.14 (4.04)
Effective discipline Effective discipline
 A+P 3.93 (2.38) 3.76 (2.04) 0.11 −0.25 to 0.47 A+P 3.92 (2.81) 3.13 (2.46) −0.38 −0.88 to 0.12
 A-only 3.94 (2.26) 3.70 (2.50) 0.08 −0.26 to 0.43 A-only 4.14 (3.34) 3.78 (3.95) −0.17 −0.62 to 0.29
 P-only 4.23 (3.40) 3.66 (2.29) 0.07 −0.29 to 0.44 P-only 3.80 (2.74) 3.90 (2.65) −0.14 −0.62 to 0.33
 Controls 3.72 (2.28) 3.50 (2.64)  Controls 3.54 (2.74) 4.28 (3.76)
 Harsh parenting‡
A+P 5.23 (3.65) 2.81 (2.71) −0.19 −0.82 to 0.45
A-only 5.04 (3.91) 4.36 (3.74) 0.35 −0.23 to 0.93
P-only 4.41 (3.25) 3.65 (2.51) 0.10 −0.50 to 0.69
Controls 3.87 (3.19) 3.11 (2.74)

*Alabama Parenting Questionnaire.

†Hedges Dw effect sizes for parenting behaviour based on comparisons of postassessment scores for each treatment arm with the control arm using linear-mixed effects models with REML and controlling for baseline differences.

‡Harsh parenting subscale was child-report only;; Significant effects are in bold (95% CI not crossing 0); borderline effects are in italics (95% CI crossover within ±0.10 of 0).

A-only, agribusiness only; A+P, agribusiness plus parenting; P-only, parenting only; REML, restricted maximum likelihood.