Table 1.
Under-detection of Tuberculosis in India during COVID-19 pandemic response related lockdown - eight week lockdown period 25 March to 19 May 2020 compared with eight week pre-lockdown period 29 January to 24 March 2020∗.39
| State (in alphabetical order) | Notifications (n) |
Case detection (%) (c = b/a) | Under-detection (%) (d = 100 – c) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-lockdown (a) | During lockdown (b) | |||
| Andaman & Nicobar Islands | 101 | 23 | 23 | 77 |
| Andhra Pradesh | 15,194 | 4658 | 31 | 69 |
| Arunachal Pradesh | 478 | 349 | 73 | 27 |
| Assam | 7533 | 3799 | 50 | 50 |
| Bihar | 19,654 | 5374 | 27 | 73 |
| Chandigarh | 1008 | 405 | 40 | 60 |
| Chhattisgarh | 6655 | 3966 | 60 | 40 |
| Daman & Diu | 213 | 137 | 64 | 36 |
| Delhi | 17,973 | 8390 | 47 | 53 |
| Goa | 322 | 234 | 73 | 27 |
| Gujarat | 26,897 | 10,646 | 40 | 60 |
| Haryana | 12,424 | 7492 | 60 | 40 |
| Himachal Pradesh | 2757 | 1695 | 61 | 39 |
| Jammu & Kashmir | 2009 | 905 | 45 | 55 |
| Jharkhand | 8616 | 3767 | 44 | 56 |
| Karnataka | 14,468 | 6960 | 48 | 52 |
| Kerala | 4045 | 2575 | 64 | 36 |
| Ladakh | 33 | 40 | 121 | −21 |
| Lakshadweep | 2 | 2 | 100 | 0 |
| Madhya Pradesh | 29,101 | 10,616 | 36 | 64 |
| Maharashtra | 32,717 | 14,447 | 44 | 56 |
| Manipur | 305 | 137 | 45 | 55 |
| Meghalaya | 800 | 474 | 59 | 41 |
| Mizoram | 425 | 318 | 75 | 25 |
| Nagaland | 649 | 360 | 55 | 45 |
| Odisha | 8701 | 6197 | 71 | 29 |
| Puducherry | 745 | 254 | 34 | 66 |
| Punjab | 9852 | 5144 | 52 | 48 |
| Rajasthan | 26,418 | 11,462 | 43 | 57 |
| Sikkim | 284 | 219 | 77 | 23 |
| Tamil Nadu | 17,025 | 5466 | 32 | 68 |
| Telangana | 12,985 | 6221 | 48 | 52 |
| Tripura | 451 | 227 | 50 | 50 |
| Uttar Pradesh | 77,887 | 20,692 | 27 | 73 |
| Uttarakhand | 4200 | 2373 | 57 | 44 |
| West Bengal | 17,098 | 8261 | 48 | 52 |
| Total | 380,025 | 154,285 | 41 | 59∗∗ |
∗notification data extracted on 11 June 2020 from the NIKSHAY website 39; ∗∗when compared with previous year (25 March to 19 May 2019), the national under-detection was 62%.