Table 5.
Unadjusted beta coefficient | 95 % CI | P † | Adjusted beta coefficient | 95 % CI | P † | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cognition | ||||||
Sex | –0·1 | –0·9, 0·9 | 0·977 | –0·3 | –1·2, 0·6 | 0·529 |
Mean body Fe‡ | 0·1 | –0·1, 0·2 | 0·131 | 0·1 | –0·1, 0·2 | 0·306 |
Mean blood Pb§ | –0·1 | –0·2, –0·02 | 0·009 | –0·2 | –0·2, –0·03 | 0·009 |
Mother’s IQ scores | 0·1 | –0·01, 0·06 | 0·203 | 0·01 | –0·03, 0·05 | 0·712 |
WAMI | 1·5 | 0·5, 2·4 | 0·002 | 1·4 | 0·4, 2·4 | 0·006 |
Expressive language | ||||||
Sex | 1·7 | 0·5, 2·3 | 0·006 | 1·4 | 0·2, 2·7 | 0·020 |
Mean body Fe‡ | 0·1 | –0·02, 0·3 | 0·111 | 0·04 | –0·1– 0·2 | 0·548 |
Mean blood Pb§ | –0·2 | –0·3, –0·06 | 0·003 | –0·2 | –0·3, –0·1 | 0·006 |
Mother’s IQ scores | 0·04 | –0·02, 0·09 | 0·64 | 0·1 | –0·5, 0·07 | 0·673 |
WAMI | 1·6 | 0·3, 2·9 | 0·015 | 1·5 | 0·09, 2·8 | 0·036 |
Receptive language | ||||||
Sex | 0·4 | –0·2, 1·1 | 0·188 | 0·2 | –0·4, 0·9 | 0·473 |
Mean body Fe‡ | 0·07 | –0·02, 0·2 | 0·125 | 0·03 | 0·05, 0·1 | 0·408 |
Mean blood Pb§ | –0·04 | –0·1, 0·02 | 0·185 | –0·04 | –0·1, 0·02 | 0·205 |
Mother’s IQ scores | 0·05 | 0·02, 0·08 | 0·001 | 0·04 | 0·01, 0·07 | 0·007 |
WAMI | 0·8 | 0·6, 1·5 | 0·034 | 0·4 | –0·3, 1·1 | 0·294 |
IQ, intelligence quotient; WAMI, Water and sanitation, Assets, Maternal education and Income score for socio-economic status.
Of the 228 children who completed 2 years of follow-up, two subjects had missing data either in blood Pb levels or in development scores; hence, the linear model includes data for only 226 children.
Significant associations in unadjusted and adjusted analyses are presented in bold letters.
Mean cumulative body Fe of 7, 15 and 24 months.
Mean cumulative blood Pb levels of 15 and 24 months.