Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 29;8(2):117. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020117

Table 1.

Quality of studies.

Risk of Bias Selection of Participants Confounding Variables Intervention Measurement Blinding of Outcome Assessment Incomplete Outcome Data Selective Outcome Reporting
Jin et al. [23], 2010
Lu [24], 2013
Feng et al. [25], 2013
Hu [26], 2015
Yuan [27], 2018
Liu & Zhong [28], 2018
Xu et al. [29], 2019
Fengyue&Junko [30], 2018
Yu et al. [31], 2015
Fan et al. [32], 2016
Qun [33], 2013
Li et al. [34], 2018
Jin, Li, et al. [35], 2018
Yang et al. [36], 2016
Lu et al. [37], 2017
Huang et al. [38], 2012
Song et al. [39], 2016
Fen et al. [40], 2017
Ryan Greysen [41], 2017
Lagergren et al. [42], 2018
Sharada et al. [43], 2018
Larissa S et al. [44], 2012
Mitsuhiro S et al. [45], 2018
Hajime T et al. [46], 2019
Greg A et al. [47], 2015
Ramon L et al. [48], 2018
Julieta et al. [49], 2016
Saori et al. [50], 2017
Edward et al. [51], 2016
Vicky et al. [52], 2017
Julie [53], 2019
Shota Hamada et al. [54], 2019
Peter et al. [55], 2015
Maria et al. [56], 2017
Leena et al. [57], 2017

Notes: Low risk of bias; High risk of bias; Unclear.