Table 5.
The comparative performance of DenseNet-121 with Mish and ReLU using different optimizer methods.
| Activation Function& Optimizer Methods |
Accuracy % |
Precision % |
Recall % |
F1 Measure % |
Training Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadam & ReLU | 98.62 | 98.56 | 98.69 | 98.61 | 123 min 10 sec |
| Nadam & Mish | 98.88 | 98.83 | 98.91 | 98.87 | 123 min 29 sec |
| Adamax & ReLU | 95.69 | 95.65 | 95.9 | 95.68 | 118 min 27 sec |
| Adamax & Mish | 96.38 | 96.32 | 96.54 | 96.37 | 118 min 39 sec |
| Adam & ReLU | 95.09 | 95.02 | 95.22 | 95.08 | 119 min 40 sec |
| Adam & Mish | 95.43 | 95.37 | 95.59 | 95.42 | 120 min 17 sec |
| Adadelta & ReLU | 91.82 | 91.75 | 91.83 | 91.78 | 116 min 22 sec |
| Adadelta & Mish | 92.34 | 92.27 | 92.34 | 92.3 | 116 min 47 sec |
| RMSprop & ReLU | 89.15 | 89.12 | 89.05 | 89.08 | 114 min 29 sec |
| RMSprop & Mish | 91.65 | 91.59 | 91.62 | 91.6 | 115 min 09 sec |
| Adagrad & ReLU | 85.19 | 85.29 | 84.92 | 85.04 | 117 min 48 sec |
| Adagrad & Mish | 88.03 | 88.07 | 87.85 | 87.93 | 118 min 05 sec |
| SGD & ReLU | 81.06 | 81.12 | 80.74 | 80.86 | 123 min 45 sec |
| SGD & Mish | 82.53 | 82.69 | 82.15 | 82.31 | 123 min 57 sec |