Skip to main content
letter
. 2020 Jun 19;20(12):3479. doi: 10.3390/s20123479

Table 3.

Our simulation of the optimal parameters for the rear focal point.

SET EFL (mm) Pinhole Position D
(mm)
Pinhole Size ψ (μm) ΔX1 (mm) Slope 1 ΔX2 (mm) Slope 2
1 100 113.5 60 1.436 4.178 9.618 0.624
2 70 1.465 4.095 9.361 0.641
3 75 1.493 4.019 10.342 0.58
4 80 1.518 3.952 11.314 0.53
5 90 1.581 3.795 13.583 0.442
7 113.5 75 1.465 4.095 9.361 0.641
8 114 1.527 3.929 8.903 0.674
SET EFL (mm) Pinhole Position D
(mm)
Pinhole Size ψ (μm) ΔX1 (mm) Slope 1 ΔX2 (mm) Slope 2
10 200 273.5 140 1.431 4.192 7.323 0.819
11 150 1.453 4.129 8.181 0.733
12 160 1.48 4.055 9.49 0.632
13 170 1.497 4.007 9.356 0.641
14 180 1.517 3.956 10.061 0.596
15 190 1.539 3.9 10.977 0.547
16 200 1.557 3.855 10.74 0.559
17 210 1.578 3.803 11.116 0.54
18 220 1.609 3.728 13.002 0.461
20 270.5 160 1.429 4.197 11.135 0.539
21 271 1.43 4.195 9.959 0.602
22 271.5 1.44 4.168 9.77 0.614
23 272 1.442 4.161 8.8 0.682
24 272.5 1.451 4.134 8.665 0.692
25 273 1.465 4.096 8.896 0.674
26 273.5 1.48 4.055 9.49 0.632
27 274 1.487 4.035 9.142 0.656
28 274.5 1.493 4.019 8.307 0.722
29 275 1.504 3.988 8.401 0.714
30 275.5 1.512 3.969 8.13 0.738
31 276 1.517 3.955 7.904 0.759