Table 2.

Measured rate of correctly-tagged events (rate_UP) [fake events, (rate_DOWN)] and corresponding amounts of external trigger with an event measured by Cherenkov prototype also (trig-ext-coin). Last column shows the net percentage of external triggers which correspond to correctly-tagged events, with a charge threshold equal to 60 a.u.

SDT	RateUP	trig-ext-coinUP	RateDOWN	trig-ext-coinDOWN	Correctly-tag
[a.u.]	[$\mathbf{m}\mathbf{Hz}$]	[%]	[$\mathbf{m}\mathbf{Hz}$]	[%]	[%]
290	$14.7\pm 0.2$	$15.9\pm 0.2$	$0.27\pm 0.04$	$0.29\pm 0.05$	$15.6\pm 0.2$
280	$16.5\pm 0.5$	$17.0\pm 0.5$	$0.25\pm 0.05$	$0.27\pm 0.05$	$16.8\pm 0.5$
270	$18.3\pm 0.4$	$18.8\pm 0.4$	$0.58\pm 0.08$	$0.62\pm 0.08$	$18.2\pm 0.5$
260	$19.0\pm 0.5$	$19.8\pm 0.5$	$0.63\pm 0.08$	$0.68\pm 0.09$	$19.1\pm 0.5$
255	$19.6\pm 0.4$	$20.3\pm 0.4$	$0.94\pm 0.08$	$1.79\pm 0.16$	$18.5\pm 0.4$
254	$21.6\pm 0.5$	$22.3\pm 0.5$	$1.33\pm 0.14$	$1.42\pm 0.15$	$20.8\pm 0.5$
253	$20.0\pm 0.3$	$21.0\pm 0.3$	$1.05\pm 0.06$	$1.10\pm 0.06$	$19.9\pm 0.4$