. 2020 Jun 19;20(12):3463. doi: 10.3390/s20123463

Table 5.

Results of rank pooling fused with max and average pooling: hold-out setting.

Composite Activity Recognition Results: Pooling Techniques Combined
Pooling Technique	Average F1	Accuracy	Weighted F1
$R a n k P o o l i n g$	58.57	58.37	58.43
$R P_{F w d R e v}$	58.2	57.89	58.21
$R P_{H e l l i n g e r}$	59.59	59.09	59.56
$R P_{H e l l i n g e r_F w d R e v}$	58.80	58.85	58.63
$R P_{P o w e r}$	57.91	58.13	57.48
$R P_{P o w e r_F w d R e v}$	62.59	62.68	62.3
$R P_{H e l l i n g e r_P o w e r}$	61.96	61.48	62.00
$R P_{H e l l i n g e r F w d R e v_P o w e r F w d R e v}$	63.65	63.64	63.48