Skip to main content
letter
. 2020 Jun 26;20(12):3609. doi: 10.3390/s20123609

Table 2.

Analytical performances of HP and HP-AuNPs electrodes for dopamine (DA) detection compared with other types of electrode.

Electrode Substrate Technique LOD (µM) Linear Domain
(M)
Ref.
HP Stone paper LSV 0.3 10−6–10−3 This work
HP-AuNPs Stone paper LSV 0.03 10−7–10−3 This work
SPCE PET SWV 0.73 5 × 10−6–10−5 [1]
e-FGPE graphite paper DPV 0.01 0.5 × 10−6–35 × 10−6 [16]
SPE-MWCNT ceramic DPV 0.015 5·× 10−8–10−6 [17]
AuNPs-SPC Polystyrene based film SWV 0.008 2·× 10−7–10−4 [19]
SPCE/CB-ERGO PET SWV 0.41 10−6–10−5 [27]
Pt-AuNPs/LIG/PDMS PDMS DPV 0.075 9.5 × 10−7–3 × 10−5 [28]
Graphene/AuNP/GCE GCE DPV 1.86 5 × 10−6–10−3 [29]

PET—polyethylene terephthalate; PDMS—polydimethylsiloxane; LIG—laser-induced graphene; e-FGPE—exfoliated flexible graphite paper electrode; CB-ERGO—carbon black-electrochemically reduced graphene oxide; SPCE—screen-printed carbon electrode; SPC—screen-printed carbon; SPE-MWCNT—screen-printed electrode- multi-wall carbon nanotube; GCE—glassy carbon electrode; LSV—linear sweep voltammetry; SWV—square wave voltammetry; DPV—differential pulse voltammetry.