Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 12;9(6):463. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9060463

Table 1.

General characteristic of the included studies.

Study Country Case Number Case Age (Mean ± SD) Case Gender Men, (%) Antipsoriatic Therapy Control Number Control Age (Mean ± SD) Control Gender Men, (%) NOS
Yeh et al., 2019 [19] Taiwan 34 SEC: 51 ± 12
UST: 48.4 ± 12.7
25 (73.5%) No treatment except for topical agents * 12 48.4 ± 13.3 10 (83.3%) 8
Shapiro et al., 2019 [20] Israel 24 52.7 ± 11.6 16 (66.7%) Topical treatment (22)
Biologics (2)
22 43.9 ± 12.7 16 (72.7%) 8
Huang et al., 2019 [21] China 35 52.1 ± 3.0 22 (62.9%) NR 27 52.9 ± 1.5 16 (59.3%) 6
Hidalgo-Cantabrana et al., 2019 [22] Spain 19 49 ± 11 12 (63.2%) No treatment except for topical corticosteroids 20 43 ± 11 5 (25%) 6
Chen et al., 2018 [23] Taiwan 32 42.8 ± 12.6 25 (78.1%) Phototherapy (8)
DMARDs/ Biologics (20)
64 44.2±10.8 50
(78.1%)
7
Codoner et al., 2018 [24] Spain 52 41.2 ± 14.4 25 (48.1%) NR NR NR NR 4
Tan et al., 2018 [25] China 14 47.5 ± 4.7 10 (71.4%) NR 14 40.4 ± 2.5 8 (57.1%) 7
Eppinga et al., 2016 [26] Netherlands 29 46 ± 14.0 12 (41.4%) No treatment (27)
DMARDs (2)
33 41 ± 14.9 10 (30.3%) 6
Massallat et al., 2016 [27] Egypt 45 42.3 ± 10 18 (40%) NR 45 44.2 ± 7.1 20 (44.4%) 8
Scher et al., 2015 [28] US 15 39.4 7 (46.7%) No systemic treatment 17 42.2 6 (35.3%) 6

SD—standard deviation; NOS—the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale; NR—not reported; DMARDs—disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; *—microbiome analysis before biological treatment.