Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 11;49(1):170–177. doi: 10.3906/sag-1806-29

Table 3.

Compliance of evaluators according to TOAST and CCS subtypes.

S1 vs. R S2 vs. R G1 vs. R G2 vs. R S1 vs. S2 G1 vs. G2 S vs. G
TOAST K
(95% CI) 0.77
(0.60–0.94) 0.67
(0.52–0.83) 0.76
(0.60–0.91) 0.78
(0.61–0.94) 0.61
(0.45–0.77) 0.64
(0.48–0.80) 0.59
(0.52–0.65)
CCS-5 K
(95% CI) 0.83
(0.68–0.99) 0.86
(0.71–1.00) 0.70
(0.55–0.86) 0.89
(0.73–1.00) 0.78
(0.62–0.94) 0.75
(0.60–0.91) 0.75
(0.68–0.81)
CCS-8 K
(95% CI) 0.84
(0.69–0.99) 0.84
(0.69–0.99) 0.71
(0.57–0.85) 0.86
(0.72–1.00) 0.73
(0.59–0.88) 0.74
(0.60–0.88) 0.73
(0.67–0.78)
CCS-16 K
(95% CI) 0.68
(0.57–0.80) 0.65
(0.54–0.75) 0.55
(0.45–0.65) 0.78
(0.67–0.89) 0.52
(0.41–0.63) 0.53
(0.42–0.63) 0.53
(0.49–0.58)

K: Kappa value, CI: confidence interval, S: stroke neurologists, G: general neurologists, S1-S2: stroke neurologist 1-2, G1-G2: general neurologist 1-2, R: reference opinion.