TABLE 6.
Summary of mismatch distribution analysis (parameters of demographic and spatial expansion) of chloroplast DNA sequence data based on all populations of C. chinensis var. brevisepala, C. chinensis var. chinensis, C. deltoidea, C. omeiensis and C. teeta, respectively.
| Species | Population | Demographic expansion |
Spatial expansion |
||
| SSD | HRag | SSD | HRag | ||
| C. chinensis var. brevisepala | |||||
| Ccb(HJ)W | 0.09* | 0.69* | 0.05* | 0.69* | |
| Ccb(SX)W | – | – | – | – | |
| Ccb(JGS)W | 0.10* | 0.23* | 0.02* | 0.23* | |
| Ccb(TG)W | – | – | – | – | |
| C. chinensis var. chinensis | |||||
| Ccc(EMS1)C | 0.11* | 0.53* | 0.11* | 0.53* | |
| Ccc(EMS2)C | – | – | – | – | |
| Ccc(XE)C | 0.01* | 0.14* | 0.01* | 0.14* | |
| Ccc(JFS)C | 0.04* | 0.35* | 0.04* | 0.35* | |
| Ccc(DZ)C | 0.05* | 0.40* | 0.05* | 0.40* | |
| C. deltoidea | |||||
| Cd(EMS1)C | 0.07* | 0.36* | 0.07* | 0.36* | |
| Cd(EMS2)C | – | – | – | – | |
| Cd(HY)C | 0.01* | 0.20* | 0.01* | 0.20* | |
| Cd(EMS3)C | – | – | – | – | |
| Cd(EMS4)C | 0.28* | 0.31* | 0.00* | 0.31* | |
| C. omeiensis | |||||
| Co(EMS1)W | – | – | – | – | |
| Co(EMS2)W | – | – | – | – | |
| Co(EMS3)W | – | – | – | – | |
| Co(EMS4)W | – | – | – | – | |
| Co(EMS5)W | – | – | – | – | |
| Co(EMS6)W | – | – | – | – | |
| Co(EMS7)W | 0.36* | 0.84* | 0.23* | 0.84* | |
| C. teeta | |||||
| Ct(FG3)C | – | – | – | – | |
| Ct(GLGS1)C | – | – | – | – | |
| Ct(GLGS2)W | 0.05 | 0.40 | 0.05 | 0.40 | |
| Ct(FG1)W | – | – | – | – | |
| Ct(FG2)C | 0.20 | 0.68 | 0.10 | 0.68 | |
| C. quinquefolia | |||||
| Cq(YL)W | – | – | – | – | |
SSD: sum of squared deviations; HRag: the Harpending’s Raggedness index. Asterisks indicate values with associated P-values < 0.05; -: The variance of the mismatch distribution analysis is too small; no demographic parameters can be estimated. The bold and red letter indicates that the sample is from cultivated.