Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Labour Econ. 2020 May 21;65:101851. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101851

Table 4 -.

Applicant Types Sent by City

City Applicant Types Sent
Albuquerque White (A), Navajo (60%)/Apache (40%) (B or C, 50% probability each)
Anchorage White (A), Alaska Native (B)
Billings White (A), Blackfeet (B or C, 50% probability each)
Chicago White (A), Navajo (25%)/Apache (15%)/Blackfeet (15%)/Osage (15%)/Tohono O’odham (15%)/Oglala Lakota (15%) (B or C, 50% probability each)
Honolulu White (A), Native Hawaiian (B)
Houston See Chicago
Los Angeles White (A), Native Hawaiian (B) (25%) or White (A), Navajo (18.75%)/Apache (11.25%)/Blackfeet (11.25%)/Osage (11.25%)/Tohono O’odham (11.25%)/Oglala Lakota (11.25%) (B or C, 50% probability each)
New York See Chicago
Oklahoma City White (A), Osage (B or C, 50% probability each)
Phoenix White (A), Navajo (40%)/Apache (20%)/Tohono O’odham (40%) (B or C, 50% probability each)
Sioux Falls White (A), Oglala Lakota (B or C, 50% probability each)

Notes: Two applications, one Indigenous and one white, were sent in random order to each job ad. A, B, and C refer to the resume types presented in Figure 1, where A is always a white applicant, B is always an Indigenous application who grew up in the urban centre, and C is always a Native American applicant who grew up on an Indian reservation.