Table 4 -.
Applicant Types Sent by City
| City | Applicant Types Sent |
|---|---|
| Albuquerque | White (A), Navajo (60%)/Apache (40%) (B or C, 50% probability each) |
| Anchorage | White (A), Alaska Native (B) |
| Billings | White (A), Blackfeet (B or C, 50% probability each) |
| Chicago | White (A), Navajo (25%)/Apache (15%)/Blackfeet (15%)/Osage (15%)/Tohono O’odham (15%)/Oglala Lakota (15%) (B or C, 50% probability each) |
| Honolulu | White (A), Native Hawaiian (B) |
| Houston | See Chicago |
| Los Angeles | White (A), Native Hawaiian (B) (25%) or White (A), Navajo (18.75%)/Apache (11.25%)/Blackfeet (11.25%)/Osage (11.25%)/Tohono O’odham (11.25%)/Oglala Lakota (11.25%) (B or C, 50% probability each) |
| New York | See Chicago |
| Oklahoma City | White (A), Osage (B or C, 50% probability each) |
| Phoenix | White (A), Navajo (40%)/Apache (20%)/Tohono O’odham (40%) (B or C, 50% probability each) |
| Sioux Falls | White (A), Oglala Lakota (B or C, 50% probability each) |
Notes: Two applications, one Indigenous and one white, were sent in random order to each job ad. A, B, and C refer to the resume types presented in Figure 1, where A is always a white applicant, B is always an Indigenous application who grew up in the urban centre, and C is always a Native American applicant who grew up on an Indian reservation.