Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 2;12:176. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00176

TABLE 4.

Entorhinal cortex texture and volume in classifying NC vs. AD.

NC vs. AD ROC analysis AUC 95% CI P-value
Entorhinal cortex
Texture features
ASM 0.592 0.529–0.656 0.005
Contrast 0.794 0.743–0.845 <0.001
Correlation 0.824 0.776–0.872 <0.001
Variance 0.524 0.458–0.590 0.475
Sum average 0.620 0.555–0.681 <0.001
Sum variance 0.713 0.653–0.770 <0.001
Entropy 0.685 0.625–0.744 <0.001
Cluster shade 0.540 0.475–0.604 0.238
Volume and thickness
Erc. volume 0.888 0.847–0.925 <0.001
Erc. thickness 0.809 0.755–0.863 <0.001
Features combination
Texture (ASM, correlation, variance, sum average, and cluster shade) 0.872 0.828–0.916 <0.001
Texture + Erc. volume 0.914 0.879–0.950 <0.001
Hippocampus
Hippocampal volume 0.869 0.827–0.912 <0.001

NC, Normal Controls; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under curve, CI, confidence interval; ASM, angular second moment; Erc, entorhinal cortex.