Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 2;12:176. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00176

TABLE 5.

Entorhinal cortex texture and volume in classifying NC vs. MCI.

NC vs. MCI ROC analysis AUC 95% CI P-value
Entorhinal cortex
Texture features
ASM 0.618 0.563–0.674 <0.001
Contrast 0.664 0.611–0.718 <0.001
Correlation 0.671 0.617–0.725 <0.001
Variance 0.604 0.548–0.660 <0.001
Sum average 0.618 0.562–0.674 <0.001
Sum Variance 0.641 0.586–0.695 <0.001
Entropy 0.632 0.577–0.687 <0.001
Cluster shade 0.608 0.551–0.666 <0.001
Volumetric and thickness
Erc. volume 0.735 0.686–0.784 <0.001
Erc. thickness 0.659 0.604–0.713 <0.001
Features combination
Texture (ASM, correlation, variance, sum average, and cluster shade) 0.710 0.656–0.762 <0.001
Texture and Erc. volume 0.740 0.689–0.791 <0.001
Hippocampus
Hippocampal volume 0.762 0.715–0.809 <0.001

NC, normal controls; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under curve, CI, confidence interval; ASM, angular second moment; Erc, entorhinal cortex.