Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 2;12:176. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00176

TABLE 7.

Entorhinal cortex texture and volume in classifying MCI vs. AD.

MCI vs. AD ROC analysis AUC 95% CI P-value
Entorhinal cortex
Texture features
ASM 0.627 0.565–0.690 <0.001
Contrast 0.704 0.646–0.763 <0.001
Correlation 0.725 0.668–0.783 <0.001
Variance 0.624 0.560–0.688 <0.001
Sum average 0.649 0.587–0.711 <0.001
Sum variance 0.658 0.596–0.720 <0.001
Entropy 0.656 0.594–0.718 <0.001
Cluster shade 0.645 0.583–0.706 <0.001
Volume and thickness
Erc. volume 0.726 0.670–0.781 <0.001
Erc. thickness 0.702 0.642–0.762 <0.001
Features combination
Texture (ASM, correlation, variance, sum average, and cluster shade) 0.764 0.710–0.818 <0.001
Texture + Erc. volume 0.780 0.728–0.833 <0.001
Hippocampus
Hippocampal volume 0.711 0.652–0.771 <0.001

MCI, mild cognitive impairment; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under curve, CI, confidence interval; ASM, angular second moment; Erc, entorhinal cortex.