Table 4.
The procedure, rates of success and complications in type A and type B PAD.
Type A PAD (n = 58) | Type B PAD (n = 14) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|
Procedural | |||
Double-guidewire technique | 8 (13.8%) | 3 (21.4%) | NA |
Transpancreatic precut | 3 (5.2%) | 0 (0%) | NA |
Needle knife application | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | NA |
Failure cannulation of CBD | 0 (0%) | 1 (7.1%) | NA |
EST alone | 23 (39.7%) | 0 (0%) | NA |
EPBD alone | 4 (6.9%) | 4 (28.6%) | NA |
Small EST + EPBD | 27 (46.6%) | 6 (42.9%) | NA |
ERPD | 5 (8.6%) | 2 (14.3%) | NA |
ERBD | 5 (8.6%) | 3 (21.4%) | NA |
ENBD | 50 (86.2%) | 11 (78.6%) | NA |
Frequency of mechanical lithotripsy | 5 (8.6%) | 0 (0%) | NA |
Result | |||
Complete stone removal in 1st session | 49 (84.5%) | 10 (71.4%) | NA |
Overall stone removal | 56 (96.6%) | 12 (85.7%) | NA |
Complications | |||
Bleeding minor bleeding | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | NA |
Major bleeding | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | NA |
Perforation | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | NA |
Hyperamylasemia | 10 (17.2%) | 3 (21.4%) | NA |
Pancreatitis | 2 (3.4%) | 1 (7.1%) | NA |
Infection of biliary tract | 4 (6.9%) | 0 (0%) | NA |