Table 1.
Comparasion of the non-enzymatic glucose sensors based on direct modification of working electrode.
| Sample | Sensitivity (µA mM−1 cm-2) | Linear range (mM) | Detection limit (µM) | Solution concentrations (M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CuO NWs with(GNP)38 | 4,398.8 | 0.005–5.9 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
| CuO nanowires/ copper foam27 | 2,217.4 l | 0.001–18.8 | 0.3 | 1 |
| Au/CuO nanocauliflower37 | 708.7 | 0.001–30 | 0.3 | 1 |
| 3D Cu@ Cu2O aerogels48 | 194.88 | 0.001–17.12 | 0.6 | 0.1 |
| Cuo Nano Particles/Ag49 | 2,762.5 | 0.05–18.45 | 0.5 | 0.0001 |
| ZnO Nano rod decorated by CuONPs50 | 2,961.8 | 0.001–8.45 | 0.40 | 0.1 |
| CuO NWs with Au NPs (This work) | 1,425.69 | 0.001–31.05 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| CuO NWs with Au NPs (This work) | 1591.44 | 0.001–44.36 | 0.3 | 1 |